|
House of Ideology Welcome Manifesto Music Art Gallery Table News Services Give Links Blog
|
LXXVII. Dynamic Influence Diagram
I believe an infinity, divinity, eternally, one; is in everything, everywhere, at all times and
manifests as an infinite four. The big IF is made up of an infinite seed, an infinite body,
an infinite soul and an infinite spirit. From these four parts that make up the
structure of finite
self and infinite world follow four drives. These four drives are the drive of the seed
to create, the drive of the body to survive, the drive of the soul to perfect and the
drive of the spirit to revive. Dissonant expression of drives to create, survive,
perfect, and revive; manifest in our global culture as hatred that follows from heterofascist, atheistic,
perfectionistic, nationalistic, negativism. Harmonious expression of drives to create,
survive, perfect, and revive; manifest in our global culture as love that follows
from healthy,
agnostic, positivistic, nationalistic, spiritization. I believe from dominance within the mind of self of one of these four drives over all others comes a tendency towards dominance within mind of self of one of four worldviews. These four worldviews I call creator, survivor, perfector, and reviver. Dominance of the drive of the seed to create within the mind of self produces creator worldview. Those who devote energy, space, and time to creator worldview build gnostic theistic models of the existence of one totality with a framework of myth and fantasy that includes spirit and no soul. From the spirit to the body of those who choose creator worldview comes commands to be fruitful and multiply; prohibitions against sex for occupational, recreational, and homosexual purposes; and objections to sexual education that could make these practices safer. From creator worldview comes inhibition to love and sadness of sorrow for the disease of the seed is the creation of a body that dies. Dominance of the drive of the body to survive within the mind of self produces survivor worldview. Those who devote energy, space, and time to survivor worldview build agnostic atheistic models of the existence of one totality with a framework of myth and fantasy that includes no spirit and no soul. From the universe to the body of those who choose survivor worldview comes inhibition to hate; commands to work to survive; and mad fear for the body shall die. Dominance of the drive of the soul to perfect within the mind of self produces perfector worldview. Those who devote energy, space, and time to perfector worldview build gnostic atheistic models of the existence of one totality with a framework of myth and fantasy that includes soul and no spirit. From the universe to the soul of those who choose perfector worldview comes freedom to hate in order to perfect the universe and badness of anger for the universe is an imperfect place. Dominance of the drive of the spirit to revive within the mind of self produces reviver worldview. Those who devote the energy, space, and time to reviver worldview build agnostic theistic models of the existence of one totality with a framework of myth and fantasy that includes both soul and spirit. From the spirit to the soul of those who choose reviver worldview comes freedom to love and gladness of joy. These four categories of myth support a number, diversity and variety of ornamentations only limited by our creative abilities and powers of imagination. I expect differences in ornamentation in any given category of myth could lead to a diversity, variety and number of possible models of the existence of one totality only limited by our collective powers of creativity and imagination. Ideological traditions self-organize within a complex chaotic dynamic system made up of states, ideological authorities, communities of faithful believers and free thinkers within our global culture. The House of Ideology Manifesto depicts this complex chaotic dynamic system symbolically: Differences in the way ideological authorities lead communities of faithful believers to ornament a model of the existence of one totality with myth from one of these four categories of myth creates a unique combination of qualities, and or features that distinguishes states, ideological authorities and communities of faithful believers from one another. I
expect those who believe in accord with one of these four
categories of myth and fantasy manifest an awareness that the other three categories of myth are also possible. Out of an awareness of validity of three other
possible categories of myth comes three policies towards those states, ideological
authorities, communities of faithful believers and or individuals that choose to ornament
a model of the existence of one totality with myth and fantasy from one of these other three possible
categories. These three policies are cooperation, neutrality and competition.
Those who choose creator worldview cooperate with those who choose perfector worldview, are neutral towards those who choose
reviver worldview, and compete with
those who choose survivor worldview. Those who choose survivor worldview
cooperate with
those who choose reviver worldview, are neutral towards those who choose perfector
worldview, and compete with those who choose creator worldview.
Those who choose perfector worldview, cooperate with those who choose creator worldview, are neutral towards those who choose
survivor worldview and compete
with those who choose reviver worldview. Those who choose reviver worldview,
cooperate with those who choose survivor worldview, are neutral towards those who
choose creator worldview and compete with those who choose perfector worldview. Based on policies of
cooperation, neutrality, and competition; ideological traditions ornamenting a model of
the existence of one totality with one of four categories of myth; interact with one another as parts within a
whole that is our global culture. I believe communities of
faithful believers self organize around one of four possible categories of myth.
The Dynamic Influence Diagram is designed to demonstrate how
four drives that create four possible categories of myth interact as parts of
a complex
chaotic dynamic system that is our global culture. In its’ simplest
form, the Dynamic Influence Diagram contains one outer circle containing three inner
circles. I use the outer circle to represent the category
of myth that a particular believer and or ideological tradition uses to ornament
a model of the existence of one totality. I color circles white, red, black and gray to represent
creator, survivor, perfector, and reviver worldviews.
Communities of faithful believers self-organized around the categories of myth identified by the color of the outer circle apply a policy of competition, neutrality, or cooperation towards communities self organized around the other three of the four possible categories of myth. The three inner circles represent the other three possible categories of myth. I place three inner circles from left to right within the outer circle to represent categories of myth that have policies of cooperation, neutrality, and competition towards the category of myth represented by the outer circle. A white outer circle represents communities of faithful believers that self organize around creator worldview with ideological traditions that promote a gnostic theistic model of the existence of one totality: Members may affirm an ability of a few chosen messengers to receive and transmit exclusive divine revelations of spiritual knowledge that are true from a good one in Heaven at war with an evil one cast down to and ruling over Earth; and claim that an ability to know leads to a belief in a category of myth containing spirit and no soul. I place black, gray, and red inner circles, left to right, within a white outer circle to represent policies of cooperation, neutrality, and competition applied towards communities of faithful believers that self organize around perfector, reviver, and survivor worldviews; by communities of faithful believers that self organize around creator worldview. A red outer circle represents communities of faithful believers that self organize around survivor worldview with ideological traditions that promote an agnostic atheistic model of the existence of one totality: Members affirm an inability to know about the existence of a deity and or deities and claim an inability to know leads to a belief in a category of myth containing no spirit and no soul. I place gray, black, and white inner circles left to right within a red outer circle to represent policies of cooperation, neutrality, and competition applied towards communities of faithful believers that self organize around reviver, perfector, and creator worldviews; by communities of faithful believers that self organize around survivor worldview. A black outer circle represents communities of faithful believers that self organize around perfector worldview with ideological traditions that promote a gnostic atheistic model of the existence of one totality: Members affirm an ability to know about the non existence of a deity and or deities and claim an ability to know leads to a belief in a category of myth containing soul and no spirit. I place white, red and gray inner circles left to right within a black outer circle to represent policies of cooperation, neutrality and competition applied towards communities of faithful believers that self organize around creator, survivor, and reviver worldviews; by communities of faithful believers that self organize around perfector worldview. A gray outer circle represents communities
of faithful believers that self organize around reviver worldview with
ideological traditions the promote an agnostic theistic model of the existence
of one totality:
Members affirm an inability to know about the non existence of a
deity and or deities and claim that this inability leads to a belief with in a category of
myth containing both soul and spirit. I place red, white and black inner circles
left to right within a gray outer circle to represent policies of cooperation, neutrality and
competition applied towards communities
of faithful believers that
self organize around survivor, creator and perfector worldviews; by communities of
faithful believers that self organize around reviver worldview. The white,
red, black, and gray variations
of the Dynamic Influence Diagram depict my acknowledgement that a model of the existence
of one totality includes one of four categories of myth and that there are those communities of
faithful believers within our global
culture that self organize around a worldview that follows from each of these
four categories of myth. I add three inner circles to each
outer circle to represent policies of competition, neutrality and cooperation
that members of communities faithful believers self organized around each worldview apply to
members of communities of faithful believers self organized
around the other three worldviews. I then add three inner circles to each of the inner circles. In doing so, I create white, red, black and gray variations on the Dynamic Influence Diagram with thirteen
circles each and acknowledge that my worldview influences and is influenced by the
worldviews of others. I add three more circles to each of these inner circles and I create
white, red, black and gray variations on the
Dynamic Influence Diagram with forty circles each. I can continue to create white, red,
black and gray variations on our Dynamic Influence Diagram with one
hundred and twenty one circles, three hundred and sixty four
circles and so on. By way of this process, I create a Dynamic Influence Diagram with a
fractal self-similarity between part and whole over the range of all scales of size. I frame the
Dynamic Influence Diagram with seven circles concentric to the
outer circle. The color design of the frame made up of seven colored concentric circles
corresponds to the color temperatures of visible stars descending in surface temperature
from hottest to coolest in the following order; purple, blue, green, white, yellow, orange and red. My
arrangement of the colors within design of the frame also makes a variation on the rainbow
spectrum created by the diffraction of white light into its’ component color
frequencies. In the language of my emotional mind, I associate the rainbow with the love and
freedom conferred upon all souls by our spirit. As such framing the white, red, black, and
gray color scheme used in the Dynamic Influence Diagram with the rainbow colored seven
concentric circles produces conceptual balance. The Dynamic Influence Diagram with a seven
concentric rings of the frame surrounding the one outer circle, three inner circles, nine
smaller inner circles and twenty-seven smallest inner circles contains forty-seven circles total. Each of the four
possible categories of myth suggests four different saviors preaching four different paths
to salvation. |
|
Copyright 2010 |